Pillow packaging machines, as essential equipment in modern automated packaging, rely heavily on film feeding mechanisms that directly impact operational efficiency and packaging quality. Top-feed and bottom-feed film systems, the two mainstream technologies, are widely used in food, pharmaceutical, and consumer goods industries. This article provides a systematic comparison of their mechanical structures, working principles, and practical applications to guide equipment selection.

I. Differences in Mechanical Structure and Film Path‌

The ‌top-feed system‌ employs a cantilevered film rack design, where the film roll travels vertically through overhead guide rollers to form a downward path. The film descends through a tension control system into the forming collar, with a path length approximately 1.5 times the machine’s height. This vertical configuration allows natural film elongation, effectively relieving internal stress. A representative example is SIG Group’s TC-series packaging machine, which uses eight stainless steel guide rollers to ensure smooth material transport.

The ‌bottom-feed system‌ utilizes a floor-mounted film stand, guiding the film upward via an L-shaped guide assembly into the forming zone. For instance, Hitachi’s HM-280 model features a 35-degree inclined film path driven by a servo-controlled bottom wheel, shortening the film path by 40%. This design is ideal for height-restricted production environments.

Structural differences in roller configurations are notable:

• Top-feed systems use bidirectional tension-adjusting rollers to compensate for elastic deformation in real time.
• Bottom-feed systems rely on single-side pressure sensors with closed-loop control for constant tension.
  Data from Bosch Packaging Technology shows tension fluctuations of ±0.5N for top-feed systems, compared to ±1.2N for bottom-feed systems.

II. Forming Quality and Packaging Performance‌

In the forming stage, ‌top-feed systems‌ leverage gravity to achieve natural wrapping at the V-shaped former. Tests by Krones AG demonstrate that for chocolate packaging, top-feed systems achieve a side-seal flatness tolerance of 0.02mm and consistent heat-seal strength of 18N/15mm. The vertical path minimizes lateral stretching, making it ideal for aluminum-plastic composite films.

‌Bottom-feed systems‌ employ curved guide plates and pneumatic assists for horizontal-to-vertical film conversion. Toyo Seikan’s TOSMA series, using this method, limits PET film lateral stretching to 3%—1.2% lower than top-feed systems. This enhances fragile snack packaging, achieving a 99.7% product integrity rate.

For sealing quality:

• Top-feed systems maintain steady pressure on longitudinal seals due to natural film droop, with heat-seal temperature variations within ±2°C and bubble occurrence below 0.5%.
• Bottom-feed systems require dynamic pressure compensation to address stress concentration during upward travel, excelling in irregularly shaped product packaging.

‌III. Equipment Selection and Maintenance Considerations‌

‌Space requirements‌:

• Top-feed machines (2.8–3.2m height) often need lifts for film roll replacement.
• Bottom-feed systems (≤2.2m height) use sliding film carriers, reducing roll change time to 3 minutes.
  IMA Group maintenance data shows top-feed guide roller bearings last 6,000 hours, while bottom-feed components extend to 8,000 hours due to shorter paths.

‌Energy consumption‌:

• Top-feed motors consume 15–20% more power for film elevation.
• Tetra Laval’s tests reveal bottom-feed systems save 0.8kWh/hour at equivalent output. However, top-feed systems offer superior stability at high speeds (≥400 packs/minute), with speed variation under ±1%.

‌Maintenance costs‌:

• Top-feed systems require annual vertical guide calibration (≈$1,200/year).
• Bottom-feed systems need quarterly polishing of curved formers (≈$800/year).
  PMMI Association studies indicate bottom-feed machines achieve 4.3% higher Overall Equipment Effectiveness (OEE).

‌‌
Top-feed and bottom-feed technologies each excel in specific scenarios. Top-feed systems deliver precision for high-value, deformable products, while bottom-feed solutions prioritize space efficiency and cost-effectiveness. Emerging hybrid systems combining both advantages are reshaping the industry. For optimal selection, conduct 72-hour trials evaluating packaging yield, film waste, and energy efficiency. As servo-drive technology advances, integrated systems will likely dominate future upgrades.